Abortion and the Left.

lifecover

I have a question, and it’s been kicking around in my head for the best part of 10 years now:

Why is it that to be ‘pro-life’ in the abortion debate means you are right-wing?

I don’t know whether you read the story in today’s SMH about the new book Impossible Motherhood and the woman who had 15 terminated pregnancies in 17 years. While still ‘pro-choice,’ the woman speaks of the horrors of her ‘abortion addiction’.

But the line that got to me was a quote from Robin Morgan, who wrote the book’s forward, when defending the book to those in the pro-choice camp:

“There is a perfectly human tendency to say we can’t afford ambiguity, we can’t afford nuance. I am afraid it comes from years of being pummelled by the extreme, anti-choice right.”

Now, granted, I’m not doing much pummelling and so this comment may not be directed toward me, but I’m trying to understand how we came to the point where to be pro-life means you are ideologically conservative. Abortion seems to me to be an issue that transcends our left-right divides. Why can’t I be left-leaning and yet also a defender of the human rights of the unborn?

[I'm inviting rants, I want to get to the bottom of this one!]

Comments (4) »

Cross promotion

The title is a clever pun when you think about it. Ahh… see… now I’ve done what your dad does and ruined jokes by explaining them.

I’ve recently written a post for the AFES’s WEBSALT blog. They’ve been doing some hard thinking on the environment so I thought I’d join them… by writing about Captain Planet…. shut up! It’s a very serious article! :)

Leave a comment »

The Theology of Ben Folds – part 3

This post is part of a series

I knew I was in danger when I started this series of posts because writing about lyrics is like trying to collect a jar of smoke – You can look really stupid and invariably when you get your jar home it isn’t that impressive anyway.

And so I’ve been mulling on this one for a while. Because the obvious place to conclude is with Ben Folds’ Rocking the Suburbs album with the song Not the Same. The difficulty is that this song has caused people who have tried to analyse his work some of the most confusion. What’s actually happening through the ballad? Did he become a pastor? What’s the deal with the waterslide?

I know it’s highly likely that I’ll end up looking like an idiot talking through these questions but here we go.

In the couple of times that I’ve seen Folds play live he’s told us that this is actually based on a real guy he knew. He went to a party that Folds did and got high on acid, climbed into a tree-house and didn’t come down until the next day. But when he did come down he had become a ‘born again’ Christian.

In fact this guy became a pastor. A pentecostal pastor. His church got huge, but it wasn’t big just beause he was an amazing preacher. He set up a quasi-amusement park at his Church (he said at one of his shows it was something like this).

The ‘someone died – on the water-slide’ line was a reference to… someone actually dying at this guys church and it really signaling the end of this guys ministry. Folds commented “I figure if he had just been preaching instead of installing water-slides perhaps he wouldn’t have been in that mess.”

I think there are some real treasures here in this song.

From the outside Folds can see where this guy goes wrong. The pressing refrain of the song is “and you were not the same after that”. This isn’t just a line, Folds is signaling transitions in this guys life.

  1. He climbs a tree and after that he isn’t the same.
  2. He becomes a Christian and after that he isn’t the same.
  3. He becomes a pastor who is eventually too well respected (idolised!) by his people and he isn’t the same after that.
  4. He thinks too highly of himself and buys lots of stuff and he isn’t the same after that.
  5. A tragedy happens at his Church which signals his downfall and he isn’t the same after that.

As someone who is studying at the moment so I can work in ministry there’s a massive lesson here for me. When did this guy’s problems start? Folds’ might answer “when he became a Christian”. But the real worry for me is at point 3, where after ‘taking the word and makin’ it heard’ he allowed himself to be immortalised in the eyes of his people. Paul, one of the main writers of the New Testament was pretty quick to quash this kind of pride. In the church in Corinth liked to do this with their leaders. Paul wont have a bar of it insisting that it isn’t with eloquence that he came but humility and anyway – God gives the growth.

Moreover – I am terrified by the line “you bought it all”. This may be a reference to the prosperity theology that grips so much of the church, but it might also just be a reference to this man defaulting back to materialism. I don’t think I’m at risk of preaching the prosperity gospel, but I am at risk of forgetting the gospel because I want a new toy more than I want relationship with Jesus.

Once again Folds taps into something in this song. He can see the failings of the church and we who are Christians need to know that our failings are visible and not just to our family or our church but to people who aren’t believers.

But there is something about that line. I know Folds meant it as an insult – But if there is one thing that I would like people to say about my life, is that after I met Jesus, I was not the same.

Comments (5) »

The Theology of Ben Folds – part 2

This post is part of a series

I have an apology to make to any people who don’t identify themselves as Christians who are reading this right now. Sometimes Christians are really patronising and think that they know you better than you do. I’m really sorry about that.

This was brought home to me the first time I heard the song Mess from the album The Unauthorized Biography of Reinhold Messner. The chorus makes this astonishing claim:

No I don’t believe in God

So I can’t be saved

All alone as I’ve learned to be

In this mess that I have made.

The thing that blows me away about this is that this is the way the Bible describes our situation apart from God. In the letter to the church in Ephesus Paul puts this just as succinctly. It makes sense really when you think about it. If God is the source of life and we cut ourselves off from God then we’re in trouble! We are all truly alone in our mess.

But Paul doesn’t end his prognosis where Folds’ does. Not “believing in God” is only half the problem. I could believe that God exists and still know that I have cut myself off from him and he is mad with me.

By rights the song could read:

I believe in God

Yet I can’t be saved

All alone as I’ve learned to be

In this mess this I have made.

We all reject God and so God would be totally just to reject us. But he doesn’t. Because of his mercy (or grace) he saves not because we’re good enough or because we’re religious enough or neat enough or rich enough but because of his mercy towards us through Jesus. Interested?

Leave a comment »

The Theology of Ben Folds – part 1

This post is part of a series

I don’t think you could start considering the theology of Folds’ music without beginning with Jesusland, originally on the Songs for Silverman album and covered on the Ben Folds Presents: University a Cappella! album.

The song takes the listener on a journey through the streets of the American South imagining that Jesus came and visited the Bible belt.

Folds’ spends the bulk of the song critiquing the southern-US culture. Folds takes the opportunity to take pot shots at the middle-class, American lifestyle, illustrating that, for many people Christianity is more of wardrobe addition rather than a heart transplant.

But it’s Folds’ Jesus that captures my attention the most. 1. Jesus is presented as a wandering loner, someone dismayed by the culture around him – a culture that claims to give him honour. 2. Folds’ Jesus is something akin to a “gentle Jesus – meek and mild”. He’s a loner who doesn’t understand how things work (trying to sleep on someone’s front lawn, but the security light comes on).

Most Bible believing Christians would immediately spot the problems with this second point, but leaving this to one side I think the first point holds water. In fact the amazing thing about Folds’ insight here is that this is what it was like when Jesus actually came into the world. Jesus was born into a society of religious people. People who honoured God with their lips. Who diligently studied the scriptures. Who travelled around looking for converts.

In fact if you read the Gospels (and if you haven’t, you should) one of the overwhelming themes is that all the signs pointed to Jesus being the One God’s people should have expected, but they refused to see it. It was only the uninitiated, the outsiders, invalids, the half-casts and the ill-reputed who knew there was something more to Jesus when he walked with us.

Folds’ also seems to be concerned that we live in a society that twists Jesus’ words. Once again, this was also a first century problem. God had given the nation of Israel the law, which was to help God’s people stand out as belonging to him. The religious leaders then took this law and tweeked it, so that rather than building a society that was set apart for God, it lined their wallets.

So I guess with this whole discussion here I’m trying to show that Folds’ is on the money. If Jesus were to come back today (that is in the way the song describes, not in the way he actually will) he would seem alien – even in Christianised societies. Moreover, His message of sins forgiven and reconciled relationship with God without us having to work for it would enrage us and we’d kill him all over.

What Jesusland helpfully reminds us is that the trappings of religion and the fakeness of consumer-Christianity are a perennial problem that we’ve got to constantly be weeding out of Christianity.

Comments (2) »

The Theology of Ben Folds – Intro

This post is part of a series

WayToNormal

Have you ever noticed that vocal opponents of the gospel or Christianity talk about God more than most Christians do? Even though they are convinced that God is non-existent or at least an irrelevance, somehow He keeps popping up. For instance, I think it’s hilarious that God is the only consistent character in all the Monty Python films.

I’ve been musing on this a bit lately as last Tuesday night I had the great pleasure of seeing Ben Folds live in concert for the third time. As we walked home from the concert, it struck me again that his music dances with religious themes. His critique of the Christianised American society is worth hearing. So over the next few days I’m going to make three posts on the theology of Ben Folds, looking at three of my favourite songs of his and thinking about what truths we can glean from his writing.

Comments (2) »

Pong – the definitive list of MTC moves

Pong

I love pong. At my College, Pong has become part of me daily rhythms (I like to play at least three games a day in case you were wondering).

Pong is such an important aspect of the College experience that over time a new language has emerged to describe certain signature moves and stuff ups. What follows is a lexicon, should you ever come for a game and wonder what on earth we’re talking about.

Serves

The Crouching Poodle – When the server’s knees are bent enough so that when he hits the ball, his eyes are level with the net.

The Saucy Ferret – A sufficient amount of topspin is applied so as to catch the other player unawares and make the ball bounce twice on the table before the other player attempts to hit it.

Returns

Weeping Marlin – The ball clips and bounces on the top of the net, totally changing its trajectory so the other player hasn’t got time to react.

Rhubarb and Apple – (usually off a serve) Rather than returning with a back-hand block, the ball is brushed horizontally, slowing the pace down and putting a nice little sidespin on it.  

Stroodle – When a Rhubarb and Apple is returned on a Rhubarb and Apple.

Forehand Hadouken – returning a smash with a forehand smash

Backhand Hadouken – the same as a forehand Hadouken but with the backhand… der

Give that man a New – when the ball bounces off the post holding up the net and then bounces in.

Back Scratcher – When the ball is returned so that there is no way the other player could possibly reach it.

The Dumb Waiter – When the ball is returned and clips the edge of the table, making it impossible to return.

Faults and stuffups

Dolphin Tuna – When the ball is hit at high speed and gets caught in the net.

Mini-tramp – Similar to a Dolphin Tuna but the ball bounces back to you from the net.

Albatross – The ball is hit and fly’s well over the table and keeps a consistently flat trajectory

Atlantic Salmon – The ball is hit and jumps over the table in an arch, much like an Atlantic Salmon swimming upstream

AMI – When a return is attempted from a long way back but it falls well short of the net.

HMAS Sydney – When the ball goes under, rather than over the table

The Pink Floyd – When the ball is served or returned and it hits the edge of the front of the table and bounces backward instead.

Reubochet – When Reuben, in attempting to put topspin on the ball, inadvertently clips the ball with the top of the bat sending it smashing into the ceiling. The ball then (always) lands on the other side.

Freubochet – When anyone else does a Reubochet (Fake – Reubochet)

Newton’s undoing – When the ball is served and bounces clear over the table on the other side

Comments (8) »

Community Service Announcement 2

The Drive Through can be  an emasculating place.

Comments (1) »

[Another] taster for what’s coming up on the Box Pop

cow_tongueLike so many ill-disciplined bloggers, when the going got tough I stopped blogging. It has been a crazy couple of weeks of college with no reprieve visible for the next few weeks. Please pray for Anna and I. We’re pretty stressed out about our Greek exam on Friday 4th September. Anyway enough shuffling of feet and staring at the ground – here’s a taster for what’s coming up on the Box Pop.

Church

- I’m actually going to blog about church! I haven’t gotten around to it yet for reasons that I’ll explain.

- The Cult of Chandler. This Sunday we have Matt Chandler coming to speak. I’m really excited but I suspect there’ll be a fair few groupies who’ll come along. I’m going to talk about celebrity and the Gospel.

- Our church evangelism strategy. We’ve nutted out a new evangelism strategy and I’d love your thoughts.

College

- I’ll share about some of our joys and struggles of 2009.

- My thoughts on the importance of sound pedagogy in theological education

- Ping Pong Vocab. Over the last week a few of us have taken to naming different signature moves that various players in our year have exhibited. Now I’m going to categorise them.

- Rules for Puash. Puash is a little game we invented when we were bored and waiting to play Pong at College. It’s a pretty awesome game so I thought I’d share the concept with you.

Compost

- We’ll revisit the agapanthus job and troubleshoot some of the developments there.

- I’ll do some compost bin comparisons across the three compost bins for which we are primary carers.

- We’ll think through the wisdom of Kitchen bench composting for small spaces.

Other Stuff

- I’ve received formal complaints about my WordPress theme. I’m going to see what I can do about that during the holidays.

- I’ve been a bit slack with Canon.beta. I’m going to bring that project to a draft list and then debate can ensue about whether I’ve got the list right.

- Other things that pop into my head.

I hope you’ll stick around. If there are any things you’d like to hear more about drop me a line.

Comments (3) »

Societas – out now

Societas

Thinking about gospel ministry in a not so just-when-I’m-not-busy-with-my-normal-job kinda way?

Societas is Moore College’s annual zine. This year’s edition has a range of articles about ministry, study and the people who do/should do both.

If you’re interested in a (free) copy for you or someone you’re encouraging to think through this stuff or if you’re interested in praying for the people at Moore College then let me know below and I’ll send one out to you*.

* I might even sign it on page 36**

** Not really

Comments (3) »